nbc home  





Uzak

Tony Rayns, Sight&Sound (UK), June 2004

 

 


Mahmut, a fastidious, middle-aged commercial photographer, lives alone in an Istanbul apartment, occasionally visited by his furtive lover, a married woman. By prior arrangement (which Mahmut forgets), his nephew Yusuf arrives to stay while looking for work on a merchant ship; Yusuf has left his village home because the closure of the local factory has caused mass unemployment. Mahmut is a strict host from the start, setting various rules for Yusuf’s movements and behaviour in the apartment.

Yusuf quickly discovers that there is no hope of a job in the merchant navy, but pretends to go on looking for one; he kills time in cafés and nervously stalks young women he is too scared to approach. Mahmut meanwhile tries to follow his normal routines (work, get-togethers with friends, racy videos) but finds himself increasingly irritated by Yusuf’s untidy and intrusive presence. Mahmut’s ex-wife Nazan tells him that she is emigrating to Canada with her new husband, and asks him to sign a formal clearance; she also confides her fear that she may have been left infertile by the abortion she had during their marriage.

Soon after berating Yusuf for lacking initiative, Mahmut falsely insinuates that he has stolen a pocket watch from the apartment. At the airport, Mahmut secretly watches Nazan and her husband leave. When he gets home, he finds that Yusuf has gone.


***

Nuri Bilge Ceylan is one of the ‘new wave’ directors who appeared in the mid-1990s in the space left by the collapse of Yeþilçam, Turkey’s Hollywood. But he doesn’t much resemble any of his contemporaries, partly because he was a relatively late starter (born 1959, made his first fiction short in 1995) and partly because his film-making is idiosyncratic and unembarrassedly old-fashioned. A devotee of Chekhov and Dostoevsky, he outlined his own project in a piece written for the magazine Cinemaya in 1999: “I do not like marginal stories. I also do not like extraordinary stories which happen to ordinary people. I like ordinary stories of ordinary people.”

Uzak (which means ‘distant’ – in the sense of ‘physically remote’, according to the dictionary, but the association with emotional estrangement is clearly there in Turkish too) certainly cleaves to the everyday in its account of the space between two lonely men. Mahmut is a man fast approaching mid-life crisis: divorced but still hung up on his ex-wife, frustrated by his tedious job (photographing tile-design) and his guilt-ridden affair with a married woman, joshed by his friends for betraying his own youthful ideals, obsessed by the mouse which challenges the anal orderliness of his apartment. Yusuf, the nephew who comes to stay, is the country hick Mahmut himself presumably once was: noisily immature for his age, sexually excitable, clumsy and deeply insecure. When Mahmut finally snaps and bawls out his unwelcome house guest, accusing him of relying on hand-outs and connections rather than forging his own future, it’s clear that he’s obliquely expressing his rage at the state of his own life. The point is underlined in the film’s forlorn coda: militant ex-smoker Mahmut sits alone on a seafront bench, under a gathering storm, and lights up one of the cigarettes Yusuf left behind when he made his exit.

In Ceylan’s previous feature Clouds of May (Mayis Sikintisi, 1999), the same two actors – Muzaffer Özdemir and the late Mehmet Emin Toprak, joint winners of the Best Actor prize in Cannes last year for Uzak – played out a rural but essentially similar version of the gap between an urban sophisticate and a bumpkin on the make. In that film Özdemir plays a director (transparently representing Ceylan himself) who returns to his home village in Anatolia to shoot a film and toprak an academic no-hoper recruited to act in it.

Uzak seems less obviously close to home, but Ceylan’s film-making has been avowedly ‘personal’ from the start (his 1997 debut feature Kasaba was based on a story by his sister about experiences in their childhood) and it seems more than likely that Özdemir is again playing a version of the author. It’s no surprise that Mahmut’s mother, heard leaving unanswered phone messages, is played by Ceylan’s real-life mother. Ceylan, in fact, looks more and more like a subscriber to the screenwriting method recommended by his fellow Dostoevsky fan Paul Schrader: identify a personal problem or issue, create a protagonist who embodies it, and then devise a fiction in which the problem is tested to its limit.

Does this method work in Uzak? Mahmut is a much less compulsive character than, say, Travis Bickle or Mishima, and his middle-aged hang-ups are undoubtedly as ‘ordinary’ as they come. And Ceylan spends more time pondering the many implications of ‘distance’ than he does getting to grips with the root causes of Mahmut’s detachment from the world. In so far as the film has a ‘story arc’ at all, it centres on Mahmut’s growing apprehension of his own problems; he ends up much more self-aware than he was when Yusuf arrived, albeit no closer to sorting himself out. The viewer, of course, is shown both Mahmut and Yusuf (sometimes together, more often alone) and invited to draw broader conclusions about ‘distance’ from their behaviour. But the real focus is on Mahmut’s retreat into solipsism, and it’s a matter of individual taste whether the result seems poignant or wilfully defeatist.

Credited as director, producer, writer, cinematographer and co-editor, Ceylan practises film-making as a cottage industry. His casts and collaborators are generally friends or members of his family. His style, it goes almost without saying, is committedly spare. He doesn’t use scores, preferring the ‘musicality’ of natural sound, and formalist rather than dramatic considerations govern the framing and composition of his shots, both static and panning. He hasn’t yet achieved the poetry of Ozu’s film language, or the intensity of Tarkovsky’s, but he’s recognisably working towards what Paul Schrader once called a ‘transcendental style’. It could be that the only thing holding him back is his insistence on the ordinary.